Pavlo Puzikov
Menu

Dubai · 2026

Back to work

06·Research

Academic Papers

In developmentSole author, two companion academic papers, in preparation.1 min read280 words

Two companion academic papers on applied Gaussian splatting for luxury interiors, one on production-deployment lessons from the benchmark, one (Reflection-Aware 5DGS) on the mirror-and-glass problem. Both drafted; a Tech Communications submission in preparation.

Academic Papers cover: an empty luxury room reconstructed as a precise cloud of bone-white points with a thin measurement frame, in the quiet style of a SIGGRAPH research plate, titled 'Academic Papers' over the line 'From experiment to production'.

Discover

Why it exists.

The 3DGS research pipeline produced enough evidence to argue something contentious in the field: applied 3D Gaussian Splatting in luxury real-estate visualisation is bottlenecked not by quality but by robustness, and the engine that wins on average PSNR is not the engine that survives the failure modes a brokerage actually encounters.

An academic write-up is the right home for it, the contribution is industry-validated applied work, not theoretical novelty. The paper frames the eval framework, surfaces the heatmap as the central artefact, and argues for failure-mode reporting as a first-class metric in 3DGS benchmarks.

Stack3DGS · Novel-view synthesis · Video diffusion · Research writing

Define

The brief.

Make the case, in an academic paper, that robustness and failure-mode reporting matter more than leaderboard PSNR for applied 3DGS.

Develop

What it took

Skills behind it.

Primary discipline plus the support stack.

Skills demonstrated

  • ResearchPrimary

    Sole author of two companion academic papers: production-deployment lessons from the benchmark, and Reflection-Aware 5DGS (classified-quadric reflectors for specular interiors).

  • 3D & SpatialSecondary

    Engine benchmark and scan-difficulty taxonomy from Easy Studio through Extreme Commercial Office.

  • Novel-view synthesis comparison across diffusion-based and photogrammetric baselines.

  • Data PipelinesSupporting

    PSNR / SSIM heatmaps and per-engine robustness scoring.

Develop · Build

How it came together.

  1. 01

    Lead with the heatmap, not the average

    Submission opens with the PSNR-by-engine × scan heatmap, with failure cells highlighted in red, before the per-engine averages are introduced. Forces the reviewer to confront robustness before they reach for the leaderboard.

    Research
  2. 02

    Seven scan-difficulty bands as the spine of the eval

    Easy Scan-Studio through Extreme Commercial-Office. Each band selected for distinct failure modes, texture sparsity, specularity, scale ambiguity, lighting variance. Reviewers can challenge the band definitions but not the spread of conditions covered.

    Research
  3. 03

    Reproducibility is the second contribution

    The paper ships with the eval harness, the scan-difficulty rubric, and the per-engine launch scripts. The first contribution is the result; the second is the framework anyone else can run on their next engine release.

    Data Pipelines

Deliver

What shipped.

Drafted as two companion papers, a Tech Communications submission in preparation. Regardless of where they land, the eval framework is already in production use guiding which 3DGS engine ships behind Splat Viewer for each property type. Writing it up doubled as a forcing function to clean up the engine-by-engine documentation and the failure-mode taxonomy.

Research origin

The paper-to-product thread this project sits inside. The full chain (paper, benchmark, ship) lives on the research index.

Frames

Selected from the work.

3 frames

  1. 01Apartment Floorplan
  2. 02Villa Floorplan
  3. 03Performance Heatmap